Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Beyond the Gender Binary

“We need to move beyond the gender binary.” So espoused a student at a recent public high school event for teachers designed to create empathy for so-called transgender students. By gender binary, the student meant the classification of sex and gender into the two distinct categories of male and female. She was responding to a question from a drama teacher who asked if requiring students to write screenplays with solely male and female characters is too restrictive. Yes, it is, the student replied. And, by doing so, this student revealed the seldom publicly-announced end-game of the LGBTQ community. That’s short for lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender, and now – questioning people.

You see, this group doesn’t merely seek the right for gays to marry or form civil unions. In fact, many in this community view such goals as capitulations to an oppressive heterosexist culture. Instead, the LGBTQ community increasingly is advocating the complete demise of heterosexual – or binary – society. They want a society where people pick and choose which biological and psychological gender traits they wish to keep or reject; and, as two post-genderists write, where “individuals of any sex reproduce in any combination they choose.”

This is where the gay agenda is leading and Christians need to recognize it. Many of us are uncritically accepting this agenda, not realizing how completely incompatible it is with Christianity, nor what the logical conclusions of its premises are. As it’s currently packaged, gays simply are trying to achieve human rights and guard against bullying. As people who believe all humans are made in God’s image, Christians naturally sympathize with these aims.

But, think for a moment about the basic premise on which the LGBTQ worldview is based. Many think this community believes that sexuality is static –that we’re “born with it.” But, that view is quickly falling out of vogue and replacing it is so-called “queer theory.” This ideology espouses that all sexual difference and behavior is a product of social conditioning, not nature. God did not make people male and female; they simply evolved into the current binary gender structure. But, as society recognizes how overly restrictive this structure is, it will embrace a polymorphous range of sexualities: not simply hetero- and homosexuality. That’s why lesbian and gay has morphed into LGBTQ. But, it doesn’t end there.

You see, if gender is arbitrary and people are animals, then bestiality is next. In fact, a Florida newspaper recently published an article announcing bestiality as the next sexual rights movement. I’m sure before too long, schools will be hosting events to create empathy for so-called “zoophiles.”

Christians, we need to wake up and resist the LGBTQ agenda. We must become worldview missionaries – doing what Francis Schaeffer termed “taking the roof off”: compelling people to face the logical conclusions of their faulty premises. And then, we must lead them to the sanity that can only be found in Christianity.

28 comments:

  1. The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

    Help! People want to be treated fairly! I won't be able to practice my Christian bigotry before long!

    That's your whole post summed up in a nice couple of sentences...

    Oh, but this one's classic:

    "...if gender is arbitrary and people are animals, then bestiality is next. In fact, a Florida newspaper recently published an article announcing bestiality as the next sexual rights movement."

    Now ~that~ is funny! Talk about chicken little!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ya, it would be funny if it weren't actually true:

    http://www.browardpalmbeach.com/2009-08-20/news/those-who-practice-bestiality-say-they-re-part-of-the-next-gay-rights-movement&page=1/

    ReplyDelete
  3. I thank you for providing the link Julie. I take issue with the report though (I'm sure you aren't surprised.)

    First - there is no real data in the story. Lines like: "Most researchers believe 2 to 8 percent of the population harbors forbidden desires toward animals..." represent really shoddy reporting. Which researchers? Where is their data/study to back this claim up? It's ludicrous and until they provide data to back the claim up I'll file this claim under ~meh~.

    There is a HUGE difference with homosexuality and beastiality (and pedophelia - they used to use that against gays too remember!). It's called "consent". A minor cannot consent - hense it's illegal to have sex with a minor. An animal can't consent - hense it's illegal to have sex with an animal. They don't need more laws for beastiality - enforcing the laws we have will be enough.

    Consent is where the line is drawn.

    (Incidentally - why is it that most conservatives claim to support ~small~ gov't, but are always on about ~more~ laws for things that make them uncomfortable? Don't they realize that more laws requires more gov't employees to enforce them?)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Joe,
    Yes! You're exactly right. From an evolutionary worldview, consent is the ONLY basis on which bestiality can be condemned. Of course, some zoophiles and pedophiles claim the objects of their affection do consent. Here's
    what British homosexual activist Peter Tatchell wrote in a letter to the Guardian in 1997:

    "ROS Coward thinks it is “shocking” that Gay Men’s Press has published a book, Dares To Speak, which challenges the assumption that all sex involving children and adults is abusive. I think it is courageous.

    "The distinguished psychologists and anthropologists cited in this book deserve to be heard. Offering a rational, informed perspective on sexual relations between younger and older people, they document examples of societies where consenting inter-generational sex is considered normal, beneficial and enjoyable by old and young alike.

    "Prof Gilbert Herdt points to the Sambia tribe of Papua New Guinea, where all young boys have sex with older warriors as part of their initiation into manhood. Far from being harmed, Prof Herdt says the boys grow up to be happy, well-adjusted husbands and fathers.
    The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy.

    "While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful."

    You may also want to check out the man who claims his dolphin returns his affections:
    http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/juice/2010/01/wet_goddess_malcolm_brenner_zoophilia.php

    You see, Joe, when people lose a moral compass that points true north (so to speak), this is what we're capable of.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Julie wrote: "Of course, some zoophiles and pedophiles claim the objects of their affection do consent."

    It doesn't matter what they say - the law makes it clear that a minor cannot consent, and neither can an animal.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The law also used to say that sodomy was illegal. Laws change; biblical absolutes do not.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Julie wrote: "The law also used to say that sodomy was illegal. Laws change"

    And ~that~ is what you should be worried about (and looking out for). When someone proposes changing the consent laws we should all actively appose that... until then there is nothing to get worried about.

    ReplyDelete
  8. But they are trying to change those laws. Ever heard of the pederasty activist group, National Man/Boy Love Association? We do need to worry.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow. Julie you are so bright and seem to have so much to offer your family, friends and your community. It is such a shame to waste all your talents on this blog while you maintain a full time job outside of Gods work. You should definitely work for the Lord. You have a gift, one that has been blessed by the Lord himself and you need not waste one minute longer than to take a full time responsiblity in your Church. The mere numbers of good Christian people like yourself are diminishing fast and will soon be outnumbered by other religous sects. I was informed about this site from a Christian brother of mine and feel like I have been sent to give you this message. It is time for you, your calling is now.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you for affirmation. Actually, all these blog postings are transcripts of commentaries I write for Moody Radio, where I work as a senior producer. For now, that seems to be the platform God has given me, though I am open to whatever opportunities God offers me in the future. I'm just trying to be faithful with what I've been given.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Julie,

    As on of the leaders of Stevenson High School's Gay-Straight Alliance, I'd like to inform you how much of a narrow minded-bigot you are. As a member of the transgender community, the ridiculous claims that you have made are repulsive. I hope you and all of your so called "followers" find some knowledge and open up your eyes to the world around you, instead of having this built up hate towards innocent people who have done nothing wrong in this society.

    If you were to see someone of the LGBTQ community in public, what would you do? Sneer at them? Tell them that they're wrong and throw the "words of God" at them? I'd like you to have the courage to come up to my face and tell me your lies.

    You disgust me.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Nick,
    As a member of GSA, I would expect you to display the same tolerance you supposedly espouse. Tolerance isn't sameness (i.e., we all agree). True tolerance requires diversity of opinion, which we obviously have. So no, I would never sneer at you or say "you disgust me." My faith tells me that all people matter to God and I should treat everyone with respect -- especially those who disagree with me.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nick, You are absolutely right! And Julie, you call yourself a christian, you are a sick, sick human being. Honestly You think you are a devout worshiper, you think GSA kids are trying to make a "No-heterosexual environment" you call us supremesists? look at yourself, really, you are a twisted human being.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Is all you can do name-call and bully your opposition? I have not called anyone a supremacist and do not stoop to those tactics. I have, however, referenced the expressed agenda of national gay rights leaders. If you want to engage further in discussion, you will have to do so respectfully and intelligently.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Julie,
    This isn't a battle of tolerance anymore, it's a battle that you have led on yourself by saying that the LGBTQ community is supporting bestiality. It's that kind of mindset that I call disgusting. Stevenson's Gay-Straight Alliance might as well come back at you and say that Christians, and your faith, is supporting pedophilia because of all the pastors and clergymen who have participated in such acts.

    I'm glad that you would never sneer at someone of the LGBTQ community, but by writing this blog, you are promoting hate. Is that really on the Christian agenda? Is this what your faith told you to do?

    "Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God." Matthew 5:9.

    Are you being a peacemaker? A person spoken as a "child of God"?

    All I'm really saying is that you should rethink the way you perceive the word of God. Start loving, and stop hating.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Nick,
    I appreciate you engaging more respectfully this time and specifying your objection. You misunderstand me. I never said the LGBTQ community supports bestiality. I simply pointed out what happens if you remove an understanding of gender as rooted in creation (which the LGBTQ community does), and instead view it as merely a social construct. Basically, you’ve opened the door for people to define sexuality however they wish.
    You may completely disapprove of bestiality. But, if people define their sexuality – not God – on what moral basis can you deny the person who engages in bestiality from doing so? Or, for that matter, on what moral basis can you condemn the Columbia University professor who’s having sex with his adult daughter? If it’s okay for you to redefine your sexuality and sexual behavior, why isn’t it okay for them?
    Orthodox Christianity, however, teaches something entirely different. It teaches God created people in his image – male and female. (Gen. 1:27) And, he intended for the man “to become united to his wife, and the two to become one flesh.” (Gen. 2:24) Sexuality, then, isn’t something we invent or morph to suit our desires. It’s something God created for a very specific purpose. That’s why He put boundaries on it and why society should respect those boundaries.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Julie,
    I fail to see where you find that homosexuals are redefining sexuality. Historically, there has been myriad instances of homosexual love, from the ancient Greek poet Sappho of Lesbos, to the sexual relationship between Roman emperor Hadrian with the young man Antinous.
    The Old Testament details the relationship between David and Jonathan, which albeit was not an inherently homosexual one, but was a very intimate relationship nonetheless. Jesus preached to love everyone, and if you believe condemning people who are LGBTQ to an eternity in hell, then it shows just how narrow-minded you are.
    As an active participant in the Stevenson High School GSA and a gay student, you must see how what you post only incites homophobia and hatred. Sexuality is NOT a choice. However much you may think it is, people do not go around saying "I think I like boys today" or "I think I'm going to change my gender for a year or two". It is a way a person is born, and your definition of gender does not fit this.
    On your comments about bestiality, you have to have realized how your comments would be construed. Bestiality is not next, as you say. Bestiality IS unnatural. However, homosexuality, however much you may try to repudiate it, is a completely natural thing, part of nature and something, that is born with you. You seem to believe that the LGBTQ movement wants to spark a gender-reformation. How could one reform a biologically accurate thing? Well, it's not possible, at least by human means. The LGBTQ movement simply wants to expand how society defines male and female, not completely and radically change it.
    In addition, you seem to have not addressed any true "agendas of the national LGBTQ movement". You say that gay people want to cause a radical shift in the definition of gender. We simply want equality for all.
    And I conclude with this: I do support your right to say whatever you want and publish whatever you want freely. But saying that you support tolerance of those who disagree with you is not what you are doing. By comparing LGBT rights with legalizing bestiality, you simply are making rash assumptions and connections that don't exist and don't demonstrate your intelligence.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I simply love how you seem to associate bestiality with the LGBTQ community. I find it kind of funny that you managed to somehow get that ridiculous thought into your mind.

    "Basically, you’ve opened the door for people to define sexuality however they wish." -Julie

    Have they, now? Is that really how you see it? The Gay Straight Alliances have done nothing of the sort. They merely have decided to join up to show that there are so many beautiful people out there that society has not tolerated for the longest of time. They are trying to open peoples' minds up to the matter.

    "That’s why He put boundaries on it and why society should respect those boundaries. " - Julie

    I think that society shouldn't listen to what Christians have to say. /That/ is pure nonsense. There are other people that follow completely different sets of rules; for example, I'm a Satanist, yet I don't see society respecting anything about that. Society shouldn't do anything that has to do with religion. It'll ensue in chaos.

    Also, I have a question. What is so wrong with bestiality and pedophilia? I see it's just fine. Love is love.

    -Capricorn Locke

    ReplyDelete
  19. Julie,
    This is the United States of America. Due to the 1st Amendment, the separation of church and state is a key role to our constitution. Therefore, America's laws shouldn't, nor are, based on God.

    Society should respect the tolerance and equality of everyone, and that should not be based on "god's boundaries", and that's the bottom line.

    -Nick

    ReplyDelete
  20. Sam,
    You’re actually about two decades behind your movement. Here’s an excerpt from a 2003 article by Marjorie King:

    “. . . By the early nineties, many gay activists viewed goals such as gay marriage or domestic partner unions as lamely “assimilationist”—an endorsement of standards of behavior that “queers,” as they called themselves, should reject as oppressively “straight.” And they militantly began defending the “queer lifestyle” not as an ineluctable fate but as the result of a fully conscious choice.

    "Underlying this militant stance was a radical new academic ideology called “queer theory.” A mixture of the neo-Freudianism of counterculture gurus Norman O. Brown and Herbert Marcuse and French deconstruction, queer theory takes to its extreme limit the idea that all sexual difference and behavior is a product of social conditioning, not nature. . . . For the queer theorist . . . sexuality is androgynous, fluid, polymorphous—and therefore a laudably subversive and even revolutionary force.

    "Rutgers English professor Michael Warner, a leading queer theorist, observes that categories like “heterosexual” and “homosexual” are part of “the regime of the normal” that queer theory wants to explode. “What identity,” he writes, “encompasses queer girls who f*&k queer boys with strap-ons, or FTMs (female-to-male transsexuals) who think of themselves as queer, FTMs who think of themselves as straights, or FTMs for whom life is a project of transition and screw the categories anyway?” To overturn the old dichotomies of hetero/homo and even male/female, Warner encourages continuous sexual experimentation.”

    Queer theory has now has progressed into trans-genderism. Below is an excerpt from a paper by George Dvorsky & James Hughes, PhD:

    “. . . Postgenderists argue that gender is an arbitrary and unnecessary limitation on human potential, and foresee the elimination of involuntary biological and psychological gendering in the human species through the application of neurotechnology, biotechnology and reproductive technologies . . . . Assisted reproduction will make it possible for individuals of any sex to reproduce in any combinations they choose, with or without "mothers" and "fathers," and artificial wombs will make biological wombs unnecessary for reproduction. . . .”

    All I’m doing is following theories to their logical conclusion. The LGBTQ movement seeks to deconstruct all sexual boundaries and categories. Once that is fully accomplished, anything is possible. This observation makes you uncomfortable, so you want to label it and censor it. That is the essence of intolerance.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mr. Capricorn,
    Thank you for making my point for me. Wow, you’re okay with pedophilia too. Lovely.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Julie,

    I have a few questions for you. Unsure of wether the Bible directly condems homosexuality or not, I decided to take a look at the Book of Leviticus, and I did indeed find it in Leviticus 20:13:

    “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

    ... however, a few chapters behind this, I found this in Leviticus 20:9:

    “‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death. Because they have cursed their father or mother, their blood will be on their own head."

    Why don't Christians condem children who curse their parents, but do condem homosexuality. Both are mentioned in the Bible, and in the same chapter too!

    One of the Ten Commandments, the most basic Christian rules, states that "thou shall honour thy father and mother". Shouldn't the basic rules of Christianity always be obeyed? Like keeping the Sabbath Day holy. Should Christians ridicule and punish those who work on Sundays aswell? Please answer all of my questions.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Michael,
    I think it's significant that you bring up the parent/child and sexual relationships, which hint at marriage. Scripture teaches that both these relationships are profound and spiritual. God is our Father; the Church is the Bride of Christ; etc... I think this is part of why God is so passionate about not perverting either of these spiritually symbolic relationships.
    To understand specific biblical texts, though, you need to understand the Bible as an unfolding story. God responded to man’s rebellion (Genesis) by first establishing a people (the Israelites) and then revealing to His people the law (Ex. 20, Leviticus, etc…) During Old Testament times, Israel operated as a theocracy and lived according to God’s law. The problem was, even Israel couldn’t keep God’s law and the OT chronicles the Israelites repeated rebellion.
    Then, around 30 A.D., Jesus arrives on the scene. He reveals a way to be righteous “apart from the law.” In fact, the New Testament boldly claims that no one will be declared righteous according to the law because “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” This new way of being declared righteous is through faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus. Jesus is the sinless “lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” So, Christians are made right with God not because they adhere to God’s standard so perfectly; they’re made right with God by accepting Christ’s death as the penalty for their sin and by receiving His forgiveness.
    So, does this nullify the law? No. In fact, the Apostle Paul writes in Romans 3, “Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law.” It’s still wrong to dishonor your parents; it’s still wrong for a man to have sex with a man or a woman with a woman. (Read Romans 1, especially verses 26-27.) (The Sabbath is debatable because Jesus is our Sabbath – a whole other discussion.) But, the Christian lives under grace. He’s forgiven and doesn’t have to pay the penalty for his sin (which is death Rom. 6:23). And, he’s spiritually reborn so that now he actually can obey the law, whereas before he couldn’t. “For we know that our old self was crucified with him so that the body ruled by sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin—…” (Rom. 6:6)
    That being said, Christians shouldn’t ever ridicule or punish. We simply name sin and call people to repentance. And, we do this out of compassion because we know sin destroys those it controls.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Nick,
    As a graduate student at Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University, I had to take a course on law and the media. On our first day of class, our professor asked us to name each of the 10 Commandments. Do you know why? As our professor explained, the 10 Commandments provided the basis for all Western law. That’s why representations of Moses and the 10 Commandments abound in the U.S. Supreme Court Building. The Bible has provided a moral compass for our society for more than 200 years. The original intent of the First Amendment was to protect the church from government, not vice-versa.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Julie-
    I appreciate your post very much. I come to this a little late obviously, but nonetheless, I was very encouraged. More so than the post itself, I was encouraged by your responses to comments given. I often find myself trying to express to non-Christians that calling sin sin is not hating anyone. It's difficult in this changing world to communicate that pointing out something that is wrong is not akin to hatred and condemnation. I applaud your interactions and I pray you would be granted the strength to continue faithfully proclaiming truth!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Julie,

    I do believe you're not trying to hate or ridicule. However, I'd like to join the discussion ;)

    You say
    >> You see, if gender is arbitrary and people are animals, then bestiality is next.


    No. Homosexuality has been around for millennia, it affects millions, and it is gaining acceptance.
    There is no such development in the area of paedophilia or zoophilia. (Not saying that there aren't mislead groups out there - I'm saying they aren't garnering a whole lot of followers or influence, let alone acceptance).


    You say
    >> They want a society where people pick and choose which biological and psychological gender traits they wish to keep or reject.


    That's wrong.

    Queer theory states that people don't pick their sexuality. On the contrary, because there's nothing they can do about it, society should accept them as they are and not discriminate against them. This neither decribes a static sexuality, nor a sexuality of choice, but rather a sexuality that is restricted by certain individual cornerstones, but can also be explored within those. You quote Marjorie King - are you sure she is the best source on this?

    Think about the LGBTQ-community not as a group of people who want to undermine what you believe in, but as people who are oppressed, ridiculed and made to believe they are sick, perverted and despisable - yes, in a culture that many religious fundamentalists view as too open and godless. (See www.itgetsbetter.org - for insight on how oppressed queer youth still feel.)

    Also, think about a society in which they are allowed to live out their dreams. What is going to happen?
    As you said, not even Israel was able to follow God's law completely. Let's suppose the Bible is right - still, most western governments separate the state from any religious group.

    No one will be saved or lost (in the Christian sense) by changing the law, and you will still be allowed to marry the man you love and live a conservative, heterosexual marriage.
    As far as I remember, Jesus never commanded his disciples to go out and make theocratic countries.
    Give to the emperor what is due to him, and to god what is due to god:
    Follow your own religious believes and, if you are restricted in that, fight for your right. Tell others about your believes if you must.
    But don't try to make your country into another Afghanistan.



    On a sidenote - what is your take on biological evidence, such as homosexual men's brain function being different from heterosexual men's?
    Or intersexed people?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Julie,

    I do believe you're not trying to hate or ridicule. However, I'd like to join the discussion ;)

    You say
    >> You see, if gender is arbitrary and people are animals, then bestiality is next.


    No. Homosexuality has been around for millennia, it affects millions, and it is gaining acceptance.
    There is no such development in the area of paedophilia or zoophilia. (Not saying that there aren't mislead groups out there - I'm saying they aren't garnering a whole lot of followers or influence, let alone acceptance).


    You say
    >> They want a society where people pick and choose which biological and psychological gender traits they wish to keep or reject.


    That's wrong.

    Queer theory states that people don't pick their sexuality. On the contrary, because there's nothing they can do about it, society should accept them as they are and not discriminate against them. This neither decribes a static sexuality, nor a sexuality of choice, but rather a sexuality that is restricted by certain individual cornerstones, but can also be explored within those. You quote Marjorie King - are you sure she is the best source on this?

    Think about the LGBTQ-community not as a group of people who want to undermine what you believe in, but as people who are oppressed, ridiculed and made to believe they are sick, perverted and despisable - yes, in a culture that many religious fundamentalists view as too open and godless. (See www.itgetsbetter.org - for insight on how oppressed queer youth still feel.)

    Also, think about a society in which they are allowed to live out their dreams. What is going to happen?
    As you said, not even Israel was able to follow God's law completely. Let's suppose the Bible is right - still, most western governments separate the state from any religious group.

    No one will be saved or lost (in the Christian sense) by changing the law, and you will still be allowed to marry the man you love and live a conservative, heterosexual marriage.
    As far as I remember, Jesus never commanded his disciples to go out and make theocratic countries.
    Give to the emperor what is due to him, and to god what is due to god:
    Follow your own religious believes and, if you are restricted in that, fight for your right. Tell others about your believes if you must.
    But don't try to make your country into another Afghanistan.



    On a sidenote - what is your take on biological evidence, such as homosexual men's brain function being different from heterosexual men's?
    Or intersexed people?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anh...
    I'm probably going to close this discussion because I simply don't have the time to continue it. Plus, I think we've pretty much exhausted the topic. Now, I'm repeating myself. But, here's my answer...
    On bestiality and pedophilia... The point is that you have to follow a worldview to its logical conclusion. A core component of the Christian worldview is that people are made in God's image and He designed our sexuality to symbolically represent the life and love of the Trinity. This has clear implications for human sexual behavior. Those who condone homosexuality reject this worldview. Most often, their aplogists adopt a naturalistic worldview that presupposes humans are animals -- simply more evolved. This, then, makes morality simply a human construct that can change with time. Pedophilia and bestiality may not be accepted today, but it's more accepted than it was. But, most importantly, there's no way to denounce it based on a naturalistic worldview.

    As for queer theory... Just read more of it. The idea of picking and choosing and re-creating gender is definitely there. Just look at how gay and lesbian has already morphed to include more categories... transgender, bi-, questioning. I'm sure more will be added in the future. Lesbian who has a sex change and now considers herself straight, etc...
    As for whether or not "gay" is an immutable trait, or a behavior... Have you read Jones and Yarhouse's study? Here's a review.

    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_7623/is_200907/ai_n42042540/

    Lastly, on the difference in gay and straight brains. The famous study showing a difference is fundamentally flawed. All the gay subjects also had AIDS. Plus, new research shows that the brain is constantly molding according to behavior. So, there's also a question as to what's the chicken and what's the egg.

    ReplyDelete